India’s healthcare system is significantly dependent on hospital beds to cater to millions annually.
By 2025, the country is projected to have an average of 1.3 hospital beds per capita, equating to 1.3 beds for every 1,000 individuals.
This statistic encompasses both public and private healthcare facilities, with public beds accounting for 0.79 per 1,000.
My table details the per capita hospital beds across all 28 states and 8 union territories in India, highlighting substantial disparities among regions.
Some areas are well-equipped with beds, while others face challenges in meeting demand.
Hospital Beds per 1000 people in India across different states.

| Rank | State/Union Territory | Hospital Beds per 1,000 Population |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lakshadweep | 3.62 |
| 2 | Puducherry | 3.60 |
| 3 | Chandigarh | 3.50* |
| 4 | Delhi | 3.20* |
| 5 | Goa | 3.20* |
| 6 | Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 3.00* |
| 7 | Kerala | 1.19 |
| 8 | Tamil Nadu | 1.07 |
| 9 | Rajasthan | 0.82 |
| 10 | Karnataka | 0.80* |
| 11 | Maharashtra | 0.80* |
| 12 | West Bengal | 0.80* |
| 13 | Andhra Pradesh | 0.75* |
| 14 | Gujarat | 0.75* |
| 15 | Telangana | 0.75* |
| 16 | Haryana | 0.70* |
| 17 | Punjab | 0.70* |
| 18 | India (National Average) | 0.67 |
| 19 | Himachal Pradesh | 0.65* |
| 20 | Jammu and Kashmir | 0.65* |
| 21 | Uttarakhand | 0.65* |
| 22 | Arunachal Pradesh | 0.60* |
| 23 | Assam | 0.60* |
| 24 | Chhattisgarh | 0.60* |
| 25 | Jharkhand | 0.60* |
| 26 | Madhya Pradesh | 0.60* |
| 27 | Odisha | 0.60* |
| 28 | Sikkim | 0.60* |
| 29 | Tripura | 0.60* |
| 30 | Uttar Pradesh | 0.60* |
| 31 | Bihar | 0.55* |
| 32 | Manipur | 0.55* |
| 33 | Meghalaya | 0.55* |
| 34 | Mizoram | 0.55* |
| 35 | Nagaland | 0.55* |
| 36 | DNHDD (Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu) | 0.50* |
| 37 | Ladakh | 0.50* |
The table organizes states and union territories based on the number of hospital beds per 1,000 residents.
Lakshadweep ranks first with 3.62 beds, followed closely by Puducherry (3.60), Chandigarh (3.50), Delhi (3.20), and Goa (3.20). Among larger states, Kerala (1.19) and Tamil Nadu (1.07) also perform admirably.
Conversely, Ladakh and Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu share the lowest ranking at 0.50, while Northeastern states such as Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, and Nagaland have 0.55.
The national average stands at 1.3, yet numerous states fall short of this figure.
Lakshadweep and Puducherry excel in rankings due to their small populations—64,000 and 1.4 million respectively—facilitating the provision of adequate beds for all residents.
Chandigarh and Delhi benefit from their urban affluence and prominent hospitals like AIIMS Delhi. Goa’s high position is attributed to its small size and the presence of private hospitals driven by tourism.
Kerala and Tamil Nadu distinguish themselves among larger states through substantial investments in healthcare, featuring extensive networks of clinics and hospitals in both rural and urban settings.
What causes some regions to lag behind? States such as Bihar (0.55) and Uttar Pradesh (0.60) grapple with vast populations—125 million and 240 million respectively—overburdening their limited bed capacity.
Northeastern states encounter difficulties due to challenging hilly terrains and a scarcity of hospitals, while Ladakh’s remote location and small population complicate the establishment of healthcare facilities.
Some some states lags behind?
Several elements account for the inconsistent distribution of per capita hospital beds across India:
Population Size: Smaller regions such as Lakshadweep require fewer beds to achieve elevated per capita ratios. With a population of only 64,000, the 231 beds available provide a ratio of 3.62 per 1,000.
In contrast, Uttar Pradesh, which has a population of 240 million, would need millions more beds to reach that level, yet it only has approximately 144,000 beds (0.60 per 1,000).
Healthcare Investment: Kerala’s ratio of 1.19 beds per 1,000 is the result of years of investment in public hospitals and clinics. The state implements initiatives like Aardram to enhance facilities.
Conversely, Bihar’s 0.55 ratio indicates a lack of funding, with merely 68,750 beds available for 125 million residents.
Urban vs. Rural Divide: Urban areas such as Delhi and Chandigarh concentrate hospitals in limited spaces, which elevates their ratios (3.20, 3.50).
In contrast, rural regions like Chhattisgarh (0.60) have dispersed populations, making it expensive to establish hospitals in every location.
Role of the Private Sector: Tamil Nadu’s 1.07 ratio includes private hospitals in Chennai, which contribute additional beds but often charge high fees.
Northeastern states like Mizoram (0.55) have a scarcity of private hospitals due to low profitability in remote regions, relying heavily on public facilities that are often understaffed.
Geography and Accessibility: Ladakh’s ratio of 0.50 is hindered by its mountainous landscape, where constructing hospitals is challenging, and patients must travel long distances for medical care.
Coastal regions like Goa enjoy advantages due to easier construction and better access.
Reasons behind such disparities
India currently has 1.8 million hospital beds (1.3 per 1,000), reflecting progress from a decade ago when the ratio was closer to 0.9.
Initiatives such as Ayushman Bharat are increasing public bed availability, with a target of reaching 3 per 1,000 (the global benchmark). According to The South First, there were 8,18,661 public beds in 2021, with private beds helping to fill shortages in states like Karnataka (0.80).
Crisil forecasts the addition of 4,000 new private beds by 2026, although this growth is not uniform.
Leading states like Kerala have reaped the benefits of an early focus on healthcare, with 77% of beds located in public hospitals (The South First, 2024).
In contrast, underperforming states like Bihar face challenges related to poverty and overcrowding—hospitals in these areas often struggle to cope with demand.
In 2025, India has an average of 1.3 hospital beds per capita, which is significantly below the global standard of 3.
Lakshadweep and Kerala exemplify the potential that can be achieved through targeted investment, yet regions such as Bihar and Ladakh require immediate assistance.
Establishing rural hospitals, training healthcare personnel, and promoting private investment in the Northeast could help bridge these disparities.
Source
- Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. (2022). Health infrastructure in India: Annual report 2021-22.




You must be logged in to post a comment.