India’s technology startup ecosystem is a dynamic mosaic of innovation, with various states and Union Territories (UTs) playing differing roles in the country’s entrepreneurial framework.
Utilizing the most recent data from 2023, gathered from posts on X, we provide a table listing all 28 states and 8 UTs, detailing the number of tech startups present in each.
This examination underscores significant facts, regional differences, and fascinating insights regarding India’s technology startup environment.
Total Tech startups in every Indian State

| Rank | State/Union Territory | Number of Tech Startups |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maharashtra | 5,801 |
| 2 | Uttar Pradesh | 3,426 |
| 3 | Gujarat | 3,291 |
| 4 | Delhi | 3,150 |
| 5 | Karnataka | 3,032 |
| 6 | Tamil Nadu | 2,810 |
| 7 | Telangana | 1,757 |
| 8 | Haryana | 1,740 |
| 9 | Rajasthan | 1,443 |
| 10 | Kerala | 1,294 |
| 11 | Madhya Pradesh | 1,264 |
| 12 | West Bengal | 1,170 |
| 13 | Bihar | 811 |
| 14 | Jammu and Kashmir | 32 |
| 15 | Manipur | 21 |
| 16 | Himachal Pradesh | 20 |
| 17 | Mizoram | 13 |
| 18 | Jharkhand | 11 |
| 19 | Meghalaya | 11 |
| 20 | Odisha | 11 |
| 21 | Chhattisgarh | 10 |
| 22 | Assam | 9 |
| 23 | Goa | 9 |
| 24 | Arunachal Pradesh | 7 |
| 25 | Sikkim | 7 |
| 26 | Tripura | 6 |
| 27 | Nagaland | 5 |
| 28 | Uttarakhand | 5 |
| 29 | Punjab | 3 |
| 30 | Ladakh | 2 |
| 31 | Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 1 |
| 32 | Puducherry | 1 |
| 33 | Andhra Pradesh | 0 |
| 34 | Chandigarh | 0 |
| 35 | Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu | 0 |
| 36 | Lakshadweep | 0 |
Key Insights from the Data
Total Tech Startups: In India’s 28 states and 8 Union Territories, there are a total of 31,253 recorded tech startups, highlighting the nation’s increasing reputation as a global startup center.
Leading States: Maharashtra stands out with a remarkable 5,801 tech startups, followed by Uttar Pradesh (3,426), Gujarat (3,291), Delhi (3,150), and Karnataka (3,032). Collectively, these five regions represent over 60% of the total tech startups, indicating their significant role in India’s innovation landscape.
Emerging Players: Tamil Nadu (2,810), Telangana (1,757), Haryana (1,740), Rajasthan (1,443), Kerala (1,294), Madhya Pradesh (1,264), and West Bengal (1,170) also demonstrate considerable startup activity, highlighting a strong secondary tier of tech hubs.
Low Activity Regions: A number of states and Union Territories, such as Andhra Pradesh, Chandigarh, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu, and Lakshadweep, report no tech startups, possibly due to insufficient data or limited tech-oriented entrepreneurial efforts. Smaller states like Nagaland (5), Tripura (6), and Sikkim (7) also reflect modest figures.
Intriguing Insights
Metropolitan Dominance: The leading five states—Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, Delhi, and Karnataka—host significant tech hubs such as Mumbai, Noida, Ahmedabad, Delhi-NCR, and Bengaluru.
Bengaluru, frequently referred to as India’s Silicon Valley, significantly contributes to Karnataka’s impressive figures, while Mumbai and Pune enhance Maharashtra’s prominence.
This concentration underscores the importance of urban infrastructure, talent accessibility, and investor ecosystems in nurturing tech startups.
Surprising Performers: Uttar Pradesh’s 3,426 startups are particularly noteworthy, considering its historically agrarian background.
The state’s rise as a tech center, especially in Noida and Greater Noida, is indicative of government initiatives like the UP Startup Policy and advancements in digital infrastructure.
Likewise, Bihar’s 811 startups indicate a subtle yet significant increase in entrepreneurial endeavors in a state not typically linked with technology.
Regional Disparities: The data highlights significant regional disparities. Southern and western states (e.g., Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Gujarat) are predominant, while northeastern states such as Nagaland, Tripura, and Sikkim exhibit considerably fewer startups.
This disparity may be attributed to variations in funding availability, educational resources, and infrastructure, although states like Manipur (21) and Mizoram (13) demonstrate encouraging early-stage activity.
Union Territories’ Limited Role: Among Union Territories, Delhi stands out with 3,150 startups, serving as a key tech hub.
In contrast, others like Chandigarh, Lakshadweep, and Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu report no startups, potentially due to their smaller size or concentration on non-tech industries.
Jammu and Kashmir (32) and Ladakh (2) show some entrepreneurial activity, likely spurred by technology innovations related to tourism.
Potential for Growth: States such as Andhra Pradesh, which has 0 startups in the dataset, present a puzzling scenario.
Given its IT-friendly policies and cities like Visakhapatnam, this statistic may indicate data deficiencies rather than an absence of entrepreneurial activity.
Future updates from sources like Startup India could uncover hidden potential.
Conclusion
The technology startup environment in India for the year 2025, as indicated by the data, reveals a vibrant interaction between established centers and new entrants.
Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, and Karnataka are at the forefront, while states such as Bihar and Rajasthan indicate an expansion of the startup ecosystem.
Nevertheless, the significant lack of startups in certain northeastern states and Union Territories underscores the necessity for focused policies to address regional disparities. For the most recent and precise statistics, readers are advised to consult official resources such as Startup India (www.startupindia.gov.in) or reports from the DPIIT.
As the narrative of India’s startups progresses, these figures serve as evidence of its innovative essence – and a reminder to foster entrepreneurship across the country.




You must be logged in to post a comment.